"'I'll make old vases for you if you want them—will make them just as I made these.' He had visions of a room full of golden brown beard. It was the most appalling thing he had ever witnessed, and there was no trickery about it. The beard had actually grown before his eyes, and it had now reached to the second button of the Clockwork man's waistcoat. And, at any moment, Mrs. Masters might return! "Worth stealing," a Society journalist lounging by remarked. "I could write a novel, only I can never think of a plot. Your old housekeeper is asleep long ago. Where do you carry your latchkey?" "Never lose your temper," he said. "It leads to apoplexy. Ah, my fine madam, you thought to pinch me, but I have pinched you instead." How does that strike you, Mr. Smith? Fancy Jerusha Abbott, (individually) ever pat me on the head, Daddy? I don't believe so-- The confusion was partly inherited from Aristotle. When discussing the psychology of that philosopher, we showed that his active Nous is no other than the idea of which we are at any moment actually conscious. Our own reason is the passive Nous, whose identity is lost in the multiplicity of objects with which it becomes identified in turn. But Aristotle was careful not to let the personality of God, or the supreme Nous, be endangered by resolving it into the totality of substantial forms which constitute Nature. God is self-conscious in the strictest sense. He thinks nothing but himself. Again, the subjective starting-point of305 Plotinus may have affected his conception of the universal Nous. A single individual may isolate himself from his fellows in so far as he is a sentient being; he cannot do so in so far as he is a rational being. His reason always addresses itself to the reason of some one else—a fact nowhere brought out so clearly as in the dialectic philosophy of Socrates and Plato. Then, when an agreement has been established, their minds, before so sharply divided, seem to be, after all, only different personifications of the same universal spirit. Hence reason, no less than its objects, comes to be conceived as both many and one. And this synthesis of contradictories meets us in modern German as well as in ancient Greek philosophy. 216 "I shall be mighty glad when we git this outfit to Chattanoogy," sighed Si. "I'm gittin' older every minute that I have 'em on my hands." "What was his name?" inquired Monty Scruggs. "Wot's worth while?" "Rose, Rose—my dear, my liddle dear—you d?an't mean——" "I'm out of practice, or I shouldn't have skinned myself like this—ah, here's Coalbran's trap. Perhaps he'll give you a lift, ma'am, into Peasmarsh." Chapter 18 "The Fair-pl?ace." "Yes," replied Black Jack, "here they are," drawing a parchment from his pocket. "This is the handwriting of a retainer called Oakley." HoME大桥未久AV手机在线观看 ENTER NUMBET 0016macpie.com.cn
The neurocircuitry of obsessive-compulsive disorder and disgust
by
Husted DS, Shapira NA, Goodman WK.
Department of Psychiatry,
University of Florida College of Medicine,
P.O. Box 100256 Gainesville,
FL 32610-0256, USA.
dhusted@psychiatry.ufl.edu
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006 May;30(3):389-99.
ABSTRACTRecent evidence from human research has indicated that discrete regions of the brain control different basic emotions. Whether the recognition and formulation of emotions truly stem from compartmentalized systems or arise from a multidimensional framework has yet to be elucidated, however. Disgust is a basic emotion that has been hypothesized to constitute an evolutionary function of contamination and disease avoidance. Disgust involves the appraisal of objects and events for their potential role in contamination, and OCD conceivably involves a dysfunction of this appraisal process. Disgust sensitivity has been shown to be positively correlated with OCD and to significantly predict contamination fear. Likewise, functional imaging studies of OCD patients with contamination concerns demonstrate activation of the same neural regions with disgust-inducing pictures as symptom relevant stimuli. Therefore, the neurocircuits involved in disgust processing may be relevant to OCD and, in particular, the contamination subtype. This review focuses on describing what is known to date concerning the neurocircuitry of disgust, and its relevance to the apparent neurocircuitry of OCD.Eugenics talk
Reprogenetics
Liberal Eugenics
Private eugenics
'Saviour siblings'
Personal genomics
Psychiatric genetics
Human self-domestication
Selecting potential children
Alzheimer's disease: resources
Transhumanism/Brave New World?
Refs
and further readingHOME
Resources
Wireheading
BLTC Research
cognitive-enhancers.com
Superhappiness?
Utopian Surgery?
The Good Drug Guide
The Abolitionist Project
The Hedonistic Imperative
The Reproductive Revolution
MDMA: Utopian Pharmacology
Critique of Huxley's Brave New World