Source: University of California - Los Angeles
Date: 1 April 2009
Scientists identify gene linked to deadly disorder in newborns
After 12 years of searching, UCLA scientists have tracked down the first known gene mutation responsible for a heartbreaking disorder that kills newborn babies. Published in the April 1 online edition of the American Journal of Human Genetics, their findings will allow for earlier testing of embryos at risk for the disease.
Many things go awry in short-rib polydactyly syndrome. The fetus develops extra fingers and toes and its skeleton doesn't grow, resulting in stunted ribs that prevent the lungs from maturing in the womb. Unable to breathe on its own, the child dies shortly after birth.
Parents currently must wait until the second trimester of pregnancy for a diagnosis - a long time to wait for potentially agonizing news about one's unborn child.
"Now that we've identified the genetic basis of the disease, families will be able to obtain a prenatal diagnosis within about 12 weeks," explained Dr. Deborah Krakow, associate professor of orthopedic surgery and human genetics at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. "Parents will also be able to screen embryos conceived in vitro to help select those free of the genetic mutation before uterine implantation."
Roughly one in 300 people are carriers of short-rib polydactyly syndrome. Both parents must carry the mutated gene in order for their child to inherit the disease.
In the hope of finding a common genetic link to the disease, the UCLA team studied DNA samples from three families whose children died of short-rib polydactyly syndrome. Dr. Stan Nelson, UCLA professor of human genetics, and his laboratory employed powerful genomic technology to rapidly test hundreds of thousands of gene variations in each fetus.
"It took scientists 10 years to map the human genome," Nelson said. "New technology enables us to search a child's entire genome in two weeks without testing the parents or other family members. It's a highly efficient way to quickly sample DNA and identify shared gene variations among people."
In the UCLA study, the research team identified a DNA sequence shared by all three infants from a single family. Like a signpost, it directed the scientists to a chromosomal location they suspected of housing the disease-causing gene.
"Each of us inherits different chromosomes from our mothers and fathers," explained Nelson. "If the child's genome contains the same DNA from both parents, we know that the mother and father are related in some way. They share a piece of ancestral DNA -- a common red flag for people known to have or carry a genetic disease."
After narrowing her search to three identical regions on the genome, Krakow zeroed in on one as the likely culprit. Her hunch proved correct. Not only did she identify the mutation in the initial family that lost three children, but she confirmed its presence in two other families whose infants also died of the disease.
Krakow and Nelson's next step will be to seek out other genes that contribute to short-rib polydactyly syndrome and uncover how these factors interact to cause the disorder.
"One of the reasons this disease is hard to crack is that it is caused by multiple genes, not just one," said Krakow. "We are searching for other gene variants in other families affected by the syndrome."
The DNA-scanning techniques developed by Nelson and his colleagues can be used to identify any hereditary disease-causing gene. The findings will enhance doctors' abilities to determine individual genes' specific roles and provide a more complete picture for healthy and abnormal human development.
Roughly 3 percent of all infants are born with birth defects. Some 5 percent of these children suffer from genetic defects affecting the skeleton. In this group, about 5 percent are short-rib polydactyly syndrome patients.
"'I'll make old vases for you if you want them—will make them just as I made these.' He had visions of a room full of golden brown beard. It was the most appalling thing he had ever witnessed, and there was no trickery about it. The beard had actually grown before his eyes, and it had now reached to the second button of the Clockwork man's waistcoat. And, at any moment, Mrs. Masters might return! "Worth stealing," a Society journalist lounging by remarked. "I could write a novel, only I can never think of a plot. Your old housekeeper is asleep long ago. Where do you carry your latchkey?" "Never lose your temper," he said. "It leads to apoplexy. Ah, my fine madam, you thought to pinch me, but I have pinched you instead." How does that strike you, Mr. Smith? Fancy Jerusha Abbott, (individually) ever pat me on the head, Daddy? I don't believe so-- The confusion was partly inherited from Aristotle. When discussing the psychology of that philosopher, we showed that his active Nous is no other than the idea of which we are at any moment actually conscious. Our own reason is the passive Nous, whose identity is lost in the multiplicity of objects with which it becomes identified in turn. But Aristotle was careful not to let the personality of God, or the supreme Nous, be endangered by resolving it into the totality of substantial forms which constitute Nature. God is self-conscious in the strictest sense. He thinks nothing but himself. Again, the subjective starting-point of305 Plotinus may have affected his conception of the universal Nous. A single individual may isolate himself from his fellows in so far as he is a sentient being; he cannot do so in so far as he is a rational being. His reason always addresses itself to the reason of some one else—a fact nowhere brought out so clearly as in the dialectic philosophy of Socrates and Plato. Then, when an agreement has been established, their minds, before so sharply divided, seem to be, after all, only different personifications of the same universal spirit. Hence reason, no less than its objects, comes to be conceived as both many and one. And this synthesis of contradictories meets us in modern German as well as in ancient Greek philosophy. 216 "I shall be mighty glad when we git this outfit to Chattanoogy," sighed Si. "I'm gittin' older every minute that I have 'em on my hands." "What was his name?" inquired Monty Scruggs. "Wot's worth while?" "Rose, Rose—my dear, my liddle dear—you d?an't mean——" "I'm out of practice, or I shouldn't have skinned myself like this—ah, here's Coalbran's trap. Perhaps he'll give you a lift, ma'am, into Peasmarsh." Chapter 18 "The Fair-pl?ace." "Yes," replied Black Jack, "here they are," drawing a parchment from his pocket. "This is the handwriting of a retainer called Oakley." HoME大桥未久AV手机在线观看
ENTER NUMBET 0016www.gamedcr.com.cn fzmjlrz.com.cn haonongmin.com.cn www.gzgywq.com.cn leenuisun.com.cn www.sxgdgs.net.cn taqqq.com.cn www.mxtrmc.com.cn pcyfoh.com.cn www.wsdtop.com.cn
